I've been working a lot recently on my
SQLAutoDoc program, trying to get it to a point where other folks could use it. To that end, I created a setup for it and have fixed some bugs that didn't bother me but which might bother others (computability with IE vs Firefox, for example).
I'm still working on documentation which I see as being a big part of the project. How can someone take advantage of a feature if they're not sure how it works or aren't even aware that it exists? An example of this is a change I made a few months back. The descriptions of tables/views/functions/etc. are now stored both in the database and also as extended properties so they'll show up when using Enterprise Manager (or SQL Server Management Studio, for 2005 folks).
I'm also seeing a couple of deficiencies: The charting, which I see as one of the coolest things about the app (watch the db size grow!) is actually just a taste of what's possible. For example, it would be nifty to be able to see which periods of the day are busiest by selecting a date range then seeing min/average/max connection counts for each hour in the period. I also think it would be good to take a pass at improving performance as some scans take a long time to complete, currently. Better performance would enable more scans and thus finer resolution into schema changes.
Mr. Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, is scheduled to speak at Columbia University in NYC soon. There's a lot of controversy surrounding this speech and I think a lot of the controversy is ill-placed. Some is stoked by the media for sake of ratings, some is stoked by folks who regard Iran as an enemy of Israel (which is in no danger of running out of enemies anytime soon), and some by folks who are looking for the next big demon on which to blame our conflaguration in Iraq (we killed the last big demon,
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi).
It looks to me like Ahmadinejad is very successfully taunting the US and playing up US xenophobia. When he offers to lay a wreath at the 9/11 site and is denounced as a terrorist, it makes the US look callous and ungracious. His letter to Bush, his visit here and his speeches are intended for this same end, I believe. This is something akin to
Hugo Chavez's offer to fund low-income heating oil in the US, or
Fidel Castro's offer to send medical assistance after Hurricane Katrina.
We here in the US have a great deal of difficulty with nuance. As a society, we want everything to have sharply defined edges. Either Iran is good or it is bad, either we are winning in Iraq or we are losing. Folks elsewhere don't share our cultural blinders, and Ahmadinejad, Castro and Chavez play us up to make us look like buffoons and make our various admonitions ring somewhat hollow on the world stage.
A few months ago, Lt. Col. Paul Yingling raised much controversy with an article in the Armed Forces Journal entitled
"A failure in generalship". One of the issues that he cites is a narrowly focused education of military leaders:
An understanding of the larger aspects of war is essential to great generalship. However, a survey of Army three- and four-star generals shows that only 25 percent hold advanced degrees from civilian institutions in the social sciences or humanities.
I would suggest that this diagnosis carries even beyond the ranks of the military. A deemphasis of the liberal arts (and a shunning of all thinks "liberal") has ossified us; we are rapidly losing the flexibility and adaptability that has enabled us in the past to work well with other cultures and that has in the past brought us the respect and admiration of the world. In an internet-enabled world, we all must be
Homer Atkins.
I use
Google Analytics and think it's wonderful.
In the past I'd looked into search engine optimization a bit, on behalf of a client. While SEO techniques might be helpful, I tend to think that the internet is somewhat organic and rises and falls like the tide as search terms become popular, fade into obscurity then become popular again.
I have a three year old who is very interested in dinosaurs. In the process of helping him with his research, I rented
Before the Dinosaurs from Netflix. As the name suggests, the documentary covers forms of life that preceded the dinosaurs. What was interesting to me though was the relative temperatures and oxygen levels (<30% of today's levels), as well as the periods of mass extinction. From a historical point of view, global warming is nothing new and rather than all die off in a massive flood, precedent suggests instead that we'll diversify into 25 foot tall dinohumans. Wonder what the stock market will look like in 10 million years?